Showing posts with label series. Show all posts
Showing posts with label series. Show all posts

Sunday, November 24, 2013

Just Released! Frisky Business, the NEW Sasha Jackson Mystery, is now available!


Woo-hoo!  

FRISKY BUSINESS is out now!

This time around, PI Sasha Jackson is investigating the murder of a porn star...  


The drug addicted girl was a worthless nobody, so the cops aren't putting much effort into finding out who killed her.  Sasha takes on the case, and learns that the dirty picture business is way dirtier than it seems.  She discovers surprising motives and even more surprising secrets, and just when she thinks she's solved the case, another dead body turns up.  


Meanwhile, Sasha's private life is a shambles.  Her brother is pissing her off, Sasha's love-life is on the rocks, and her BFF has her nose out of joint over Sasha's latest revelations.   And then there's the driving instructor, the locksmith and the glazier.  Let's just say it's a good thing that Sasha has a credit card.  


Why can't everyone just chill out long enough for Sasha to get in a good jam session, or have a good night's sleep?  


Oh, for crying out loud, pass the Scotch...



Get your copy of FRISKY BUSINESS 

now from AMAZON.  


PI Sasha Jackson: She's a beautiful mess, 
but you should see the other guy... 






Friday, November 8, 2013

New Cover for Blood and Groom?

I was never a fan of the original cover for Blood and Groom.  It was my first book, and the publisher chose the cover.  Since I'd never published a book before, I went along with their choice (what did I know?  In fact, what do I know even now?)   I understand why the publisher chose the image they did, but I've had some negative feedback about it since day one.  

So, I'd love to know what you folks think of these samples, each created by a different designer.  I asked the designers to come up with something  similar in style and tone to the covers for Dead Light District and The Lies Have It.  

Which of these  do you prefer?  Should I go with one of the covers below, or ask for more sample from other designers?  (I've looked at so many cover samples for this book, as well as for Frisky Business, that I can no longer see straight!)   In all designs below, I think the page background is a bit to yellowy. However, in all cases, the font size. style, and colour is okay (and it would be easy to change that anyway...)

#1 - Dance 

#2 - Dripping

#3 - Fingerprint


#4 Red Background

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Chatting with False Impressions author Sandra Nikolai

Let's start off the New Year with an interview with mystery author Sandra Nikolai!
 



1.    On the jacket blurb for FALSE IMPRESSIONS it says:  “Montreal ghostwriter Megan Scott falls under police suspicion when her husband and a female companion are found murdered. In what a Québec detective calls a crime of passion, startling evidence surfaces to also implicate Michael Elliott, a young investigative reporter.”



There are some who say books set in Canada don’t have or won’t find an audience – people want to see New York or Los Angeles.  Talk to me about the Montreal, PQ setting.  Would the story have worked if you had set it in Chicago, Toronto, or London?  Do you think the Montreal setting draws new readers from hither and yon?



I chose Montreal as the setting for my book because I grew up in this cosmopolitan city and know it well. As the largest French-speaking city in North America, Montreal is “a little piece of Paris” that attracts millions of tourists from all over the world each year. I wouldn’t have had as many opportunities to integrate certain French aspects into my story had I chosen a place outside the province of Québec. As far as major crime is concerned, Montreal definitely holds its own in capturing international headlines and provides an interesting backdrop for the unfolding of my murder mystery. So, yes, I believe the Montreal setting will draw readers from all parts of the globe.



2.    Your series features an investigative duo.  FALSE IMPRESSIONS is the first book in the Megan Scott/Michael Elliott mystery series.  Why did you choose to have a pair rather than a solo operative?  Did you play around with other ideas for a pair (i.e. two females, two guys) before deciding on Megan and Michael?



I wanted a pair of sleuths—one female, one male—as my main protagonists from the start. I suppose I was influenced by TV shows in the 1980s that featured a pair of investigative sleuths, like Remington Steele and Laura Holt (starring Pierce Brosnan and Stephanie Zimbalist) and Moonlighting (starring Bruce Willis and Cybill Shepherd). My main characters, Megan and Michael, share the same code of ethics, but their approach to solving a crime differs in some ways. Where Megan’s work as a ghostwriter keeps her behind a desk most of the time and she’s more comfortable digging up clues through a paper trail, Michael’s work as investigative reporter means meeting informants in dark alleys late at night. In FALSE IMPRESSIONS, their worlds overlap to create tense and conflicting moments for both of them. In spite of their differences, Megan and Michael have good chemistry between them, and a potential romantic involvement is something I can build on in future books in the series.



3.    Plot, plot, plot... Is plotting difficult or easy?  Fun or stressful?  How do you manage to move the plot along while playing fair with readers, without giving away too much?



I begin with a plot outline but usually end up revising it a few times. It’s fun when everything falls into place and unnerving when it doesn’t, but the challenge of making all the pieces fit properly is worth it in the end. It’s important to play fair with readers and present every clue in a timely manner so that nothing is held back. It shouldn’t be too easy to solve the mystery either, so striking the right balance is the target. I use my plot outline to mark the spots where I’ve introduced the clues. It helps me to keep track of them. After I complete my final draft, I’ll put it aside for a week or so. I’ll re-read it with fresh eyes and revise where required. Then I’ll send it to my critique group for review and, finally, to my editor. These checkpoints flag any pacing or plotting problems before the manuscript is published.



4.    One of the reviews on AMAZON says “elegant writing” – WOW!  That’s got to make you feel good!  So, how did you learn your craft? 



Yes, it was a wonderful compliment and made my day! I think the first set of picture books I received as a child inspired my love of books. Call me a geek, but reading and writing were my preferred subjects in school. Over time, I grew to love mysteries and couldn’t get enough of them. Reading all sorts of mystery novels and how-to books on plotting mysteries helped me to learn the genre, but writing helped me to develop a style and find my niche. I haven’t stopped learning. It’s not always easy to find a different or more creative way to express a thought, but I love what I do, so that helps.



5.    Betrayal is a major theme in FALSE IMPRESSIONS.  Talk to me about writing this emotion.  How did you feel as you wrote it?  How did that theme influence the writing and inform the characters?



We’ve all experienced betrayal to a degree. Whether a close friend turned against us or an unfaithful partner was the reason a relationship ended, we understand the pain of deceit and the subsequent feeling of loss. I had to draw on these emotions so that I could get a sense of how my characters might feel in the story. I also researched the topic and was able to “borrow” interpretations and adapt them to the instances of betrayal that run through my book. Ironically, many of the characters in FALSE IMPRESSIONS experience betrayal in one form or another.



6.    If you could bring any fictional character (from any genre) to life for a day, who would you choose and why?



Definitely Sherlock Holmes! I’d invite him into my living room and ask him to talk about his most illustrious cases. I’d be right by his side, taking notes on his keen observation and deductive skills, much like Dr. Watson did. His detailed and logical approach to crime solving would definitely help me plot my next mystery novel. J



7.    F. Scott Fitzgerald once said: “Writers aren’t exactly people... they’re a whole lot of people trying to be one person”.  Let’s hear your thoughts on this.



A writer’s objective is to weave a plot through his characters and create a cohesive artistic effect. Since interesting characters have complex personalities, their moods, emotions, and opinions can change from one moment to the next. To be in everyone’s head at the same time and keep the storyline organized and flowing is no small task for a writer, but oh, so much fun! It’s what makes writing mysteries all the more exciting. Not only do mystery writers have to introduce characters that are potential suspects, they also have to keep tabs on each character’s thoughts, words, and actions so as not to disclose the identity of the real perpetrator too soon.



Another way Fitzgerald’s comment can be interpreted is along more technical lines. Today’s writer is also a researcher, proofreader, critiquer, and in some cases, book formatter, cover designer, and independent publisher. Now we’re talking!



8.    If Michael Elliott were going to enter the world of online dating, what would his dating profile say?



Hi, everyone! I’m a man of strong convictions who believes in helping people. I am easy-going, understanding, and trustworthy. I keep in shape by working out and jogging. I’m looking to date a thirty-something woman who is reliable, loves music from the 60s and 70s, and enjoys the simple things in life. Married women need not apply.



9.    Are you involved in any writing groups or writers’ associations?  Have you found these helpful?  What have you learned from them?



I’m a member of Crime Writers of Canada and Capital Crime Writers, among others. I’ve attended writing courses and conferences offered through these associations and found them helpful. Their monthly newsletters keep me informed about events in the field and about how my colleagues are doing. I’m also a member of a critique group whose feedback I appreciate and value.



10. The last question is kind of a freebie... What is the one question you wish I had asked but didn’t?  Now go ahead and ask and answer it.



Tell us about your next book.



The second book in the mystery series featuring Megan Scott and Michael Elliott is titled FATAL WHISPERS and is set in Portland, Maine. The theme revolves around the shocking deaths of a millionaire’s beautiful young wife, a homeless woman, and a priest. I visited Portland several times and was impressed by its quaint New England characteristics. I knew it would be the perfect setting for the mystery I had in mind. Look for it in the spring of 2013!


For more on Sandra, check out her blog HERE
Find Sandra on GoodReads HERE
Check her out on Twitter @sandranikolai
Order on False Impressions on AMAZON 

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Interview with irreverent author Claude Bouchard



Tell me about your current work in progress.
 
My current work in progress, entitled Femme Fatale, is the seventh in my Vigilante series and features Leslie Robb, a character who made her debut in the fifth installment. Leslie, a brilliant, gorgeous lesbian and operative with the government’s Discreet Activities group, heads to Paris to vacation with her girlfriend of recent months. However, things go awry when her girlfriend and sister go missing, turning Leslie’s vacation into a clandestine search operation.

ASYLUM (released in 2011) is your first stand alone novel.  Do you plan to write additional solo-books?  

I’ve actually started writing another stand alone, The Last Party, which deals with natural disaster, greed, murder and the stupidity and egotism of mankind. It should be a lot of fun when it’s complete.

What is your favourite thing about writing the VIGILANTE series? 

 It allows me to accomplish things on paper which I could never accomplish in real life due to moral, legal and ethical reasons. It also allows my readers to participate in the fantasy. 

What is the most challenging thing about writing a series? 

The biggest challenge in writing a series is keeping it original and non-repetitious. I’ve done my best to do so by keeping my characters moving forward as well as introducing new ones. Based on reviews, my readers seem to agree that I’ve succeeded in doing so to date. 

Name two authors – living or dead – who influenced you. 

This is not an easy question to answer as I’ve read thousands of books by hundreds of authors and all have influenced me in some fashion. However, the late Alistair MacLean introduced me to thrillers with his amazing war and espionage novels and I loved his tight, to-the-point writing style. Since I only have one choice left, I would have to go with Lee Child and his Jack Reacher series. Though I started reading Child’s work well after having written my first three novels, his stories fall in a similar vein and have confirmed that there is a readership for the wastin’ the bad guys genre.

Voltaire said: “Originality is nothing but judicious imitation.  The most original writers borrowed from one another.”  What are your thoughts on this? 

I think Voltaire borrowed that from someone else. :)

How do you come up with your titles? 

To date, each of the titles for my novels popped into my head before I had written a word. The titles seem to be an attachment to the general idea for each story.

What are your thoughts on the revising and editing process? 

I know that many writers despise revising and editing but I actually enjoy it. I described editing as follows in a blog post I wrote last year: Personally, I enjoy editing. I see a finished first draft as a gem in the rough. It's there, tangible, with its own raw beauty but it needs to be refined to really shine. I examine it closely and chip away this or that unneeded chunk and make some fine cuts here or there. I notice rough spots which I buff and polish until they gleam to my satisfaction. I see a small crack and carefully smooth it over until it's gone. It's meticulous, painstaking but necessary work yet, in my mind, definitely still part of the creation process. Though impatient by nature, such work soothes me and fills me with a sense of satisfaction, for once I am done, the result is a finely crafted jewel.

Every writer has an old, abandoned manuscript tucked away in a drawer somewhere; a project they can’t just delete or throw out because someday... someday... someday they will finish it.  Tell me about yours.

Damn… I don’t have one of those. I didn’t know I was supposed to have one. Mom was right. I should have read the rules before playing this game. Now I’m depressed…

Question ten is a bit of a freebie: What is the one question you wish I had asked you, but didn’t?  Now go ahead and ask/answer that question.
 
Hmm… Okay, here’s the question: Describe the wildest sexual experience you have ever had. Here’s the answer: No. :)

For more on Claude, check out his website HERE.  
Follow Claude on Twitter @ceebee308
Get Claude's books on AMAZON.  



Thursday, November 22, 2012

Talking about the Dica series with Clive S. Johnson


1.    For the benefit of the uninitiated, give me the one sentence description of the realm of Dica.

A figment of my fevered imagination - a big figment, mind!  You didn’t really mean that, did you?  No!  Well, in the bare bones:  An immeasurably old castle kingdom, its walls encompassing a vast sprawl of city and towns, of estates, parks, colleges and villages, ports, harbours, farms and huge monumental works, and all spread upon and about an enormous coastal mountain.  OK, I know it’s a long sentence, but it is a big place - think of a castle the size of Yorkshire!  


2.    “In following the characters through Dica, you will feel you have travelled with each of them.” When I’m writing, I have a hard time keeping just a few characters and a couple of plotlines alive. Your writing is much, much more intricate. What are the challenges of telling a multi-layered story? How do you make individual characters stand out?

To be quite honest, I don’t have any problems handling loads of characters, When I first started out writing, I must admit I shied away from bringing too many people into the story, but I’ve since learnt that it’s got little to do with me anyway.  The story is what it is, with as many characters as it needs to tell itself properly.  The same with plot lines.

You see, I have a very visual mind, and so find little difficulty holding it all there, like a well-travelled map.  Just think of all the folk you know, and all the plot lines that run through their intricate lives.  You’ve no problem holding all that in your head, now have you?  And that’s because they’re real people, with real lives, doing real things.  Well, it’s exactly the same with Dica.  No, honestly, it really is!

                    
3.    Seems like every writer I know has an abandoned, half-finished manuscript stuck away in a drawer or at the back of a closet (if not an actual manuscript, at least an outline from some idea you’re fond of but just haven’t done anything with it yet…) What about you? What is it? Do you think you’ll ever finish it one day?

Leiyatel’s Embrace was that very manuscript, left to moulder in the loft until unearthed during improvements a few years back, and so yes, I suppose I have now finished it, kind of, after more than thirty years.  I’ve no other ideas as yet, nothing tangible, certainly nothing concrete.  I’m a firm believer, however, in the work principle, not in the laggard’s hope of inspiration.

The Dica Series came from an initial ‘feel’ - which I suppose was a kind of inspiration - but only grew into a proper, peopled story once I’d begun digging around in its world.  It’s like everything, really:  You get out what you put in, and I’ve dug around in Dica an awful lot.


4.    “The King has lost his mind…” What are the challenges in writing a character whose worldview is so unhinged? How do you walk the line between making a character sympathetic versus making him or her unlikeable or unbelievable?

You can make any character ‘sympathetic’, but you need to find all the subtleties and nuances that mark them out as real people, with their own strengths and weaknesses, all bundled together in typically chaotic human fashion.  They don’t have to be likeable, as such, but do need to have enough complexity and facets for the reader to find something to latch on to, to have something they can recognise in themselves.

Every one of us is a hotchpotch of the good, the bad and the indifferent, and this is what marks out any character as being believable.  I tried to bring out King Namweed’s confusion, peeping through the bluster and comic pomposity the legacy of his own royal position brings.

His is a real madness, a frightening one, one born of a weakness of mind we all run the risk of experiencing as we grow older.  I tried to bring out his isolation - due his elevated position - and offer this as the reader’s way in to his character.  Isolation is a strong fear in any social animal, and so should be the easiest for us to sympathise with.

We mustn’t forget humour, of course.  There are many kinds, but most are based on fear, the juxtaposition of ridicule and relief, relief that it’s not us!  Again, I used this with Namweed, made him into a rather sad figure, one who unknowingly comes over as ridiculous.  Most of us have some sympathy for the underdog, as though in gratitude for their taking the role we fear most for ourselves.


5.    “Sometimes, when it's going badly, she wonders if what she believes to be a love of the written word is really just a fetish for stationary. The true writer, the born writer, will scribble words on scraps of litter, the back of a bus ticket, on the wall of a cell.” (David Nicholls, One Day, 2010). Are you this kind of a writer? Do you have a collection of notebooks and scraps of paper (hopefully you have nothing written on a cell wall…)

I don’t think I ever wrote anything on the cell wall, not that I remember, but that’s probably because it was always kept too dark, and anyway, I’m not really a writer.  I don’t aspire to being an author, you see, or a novelist, but I do like language - any language - and I do enjoy weaving yarns.  I think, all told, I’ve probably only ever noted down half a dozen phrases and only ever used half of them.

The serious answer is that I like to keep everything where I can always find it, in my head.  Then, when I’m writing, it’s closest at hand.  I work on the principle that if it stays in my mind then it must be worth putting into a book.


6.    On your page on Amazon, the description says: “It's a slow tale about good people trying to make sense of what is going on around them as their lives simply seem to ebb away.” Where and how did you first come up with this writing idea? How long did it take you to get the whole story on paper?

I started writing what was then ‘The Winds of Change’ around 1979, and it wasn’t really a writing idea at all.  All I wanted to do was capture a place I’d so clearly seen, in my own mind.  It wasn’t so much a visualisation, but more a lucid dream, one complete in all aspects down to the feel of the weather, the taste of the air, and the sounds of birds flitting about dark stone roofs or within dank, moss strewn yards.  I knew Dica in all its richness well before pen ever touched paper - and it really was pen and paper then!  As to the story, well, as I’ve already mentioned, I’d no real idea at the time if there was one at all.

That immediacy, of the place I’d felt, meant I could easily draw the reader into the story’s landscape, but that was about it.  Fortunately, there was a story hiding within it all, but it took more than thirty years to come to light properly.  There’s much to be said for the passage of time, the perspective it slowly lends, and the subsequent richness it can bring.

This may seem a little trite, or even flaky, but I truly didn’t write any of it.  I honestly only acted as scribe to some other far more knowledgeable and skilful author.  Whoever they are, and however they managed to work through me, they had a hell of a job teaching me how to ‘write proper’!  I think they got somewhere in the end, though, but that’s probably best left to the reader to judge.


7.    Tell me about your current work in progress (or pending release).

As you know, Jill, what I write finds itself shoehorned into the fantasy genre, largely because of its setting.  It’s actually mystery, though, with a Science Fiction premise.  It’s the mystery aspect that means there’s little I can really divulge without risking giving away too many spoilers.

My current work in progress is now with my beta/proof reader.  It’s the third in the Dica Series, and will soon be published as ‘Last True World’.  What I can say about it is that it holds massive revelations, ones that tie together and answer most of the mysteries introduced in ‘Leiyatel’s Embrace’ and ‘Of Weft and Weave’, the first two books.

My tales are intricate, as you’ve already noted.  They’re intricate because that’s the way of real life, and Dica’s just as real as any other true world.  I enjoyed writing the series because it was the kind of work I love to read, the kind that doesn’t ‘write down’ to the reader, that doesn’t simplify in order to sell.

There’s a lot of richness in both previous volumes, and a lot happening between them which, I saw from the reviews, needed taking further.  ‘Last True World’ is actually a product of my readers, the further story that grew from their reviews and comments, and so it’s to them that I’m almost wholly indebted.


8.    Besides warm fuzzies for the stories and praise for the writing, what do you hope readers will think and feel while they read the Dica series? When they’re finished?

I genuinely do hope that people first and foremost get pleasure in the reading, that they enjoy my style of prose and the visual nature of it.  I know I’ve created a convincing world.  I also know I’ve populated it with believable people, despite their outlandish predicaments and behaviour.  What actually fascinates me, though, and therefore what I’d love readers to find most engrossing, is the complex tale, and the surprising twists and turns it takes.

I also enjoy creating innovative, novel and surprising incidents, settings and plot devices, so I’d love the reader to be thrilled by those too.  Above all, though, I want to leave readers thinking.  I want ideas to have been sparked in their minds that give a totally different light in which to view their own worlds.

                                                        
9.    There’s a bit of a bias in this question… There are illustrations in your books, drawn by none other than yourself. How do you think the book would have been received without illustrations?

I don’t think it’s made much difference, in my view.  I may be wrong, but few people have made mention of the illustrations.  They were put in as a bonus, really, not as an essential part of the tale. The few who have commented say they did add to the reading experience, but to what extent I don’t know.  They’re only in ‘Of Weft and Weave’, which is some way behind the take-up of ‘Leiyatel’s Embrace’, so I may find more people commenting eventually.

It’s the same with the bits of verse all my books contain, although they are strictly a part of the story - not grafted on gratuitously, you understand.  This also rarely gets a mention, but in this case the verse is genuinely key to the tale.


10.   What is the best thing or most surprising thing about being an author?

Oh dear, I’m not sure I’m qualified to answer that!  It would seem reasonable to assume that an author makes their living by writing books, which I certainly don’t.  I don’t feel like an ‘author’, I must say.  Is there meant to be a point after which you feel different?  Start wearing cravats and smoking cigarettes in long holders, or something?


11.   The last question is a bit of a freebie: What is the one thing you wish I had asked you, but didn’t? Now go ahead and ask and answer it.

Your writing style is unusual, in this day and age, in being quite slow paced.  Why is this?

That’s certainly true of ‘Leiyatel’s Embrace’, which starts out very leisurely, but it’s to match the somnolent, ancient state of the realm of Dica.  It’s all part of what I mentioned earlier, that feel of the place that was my very own first meeting with the realm.

Dica hasn’t changed substantially over hundreds of years, and so it was important to set the pace accordingly, to ease the reader into its almost stagnant atmosphere.  This, I then felt, added contrast to the later and culminating pace.  I wanted it to be a bit like being on a slippery slope, one where the gentle camber carries you unknowingly to a hidden surprise.

‘Of Weft and Weave’ puts the reader in a parallel period, but one of greater change, one where a slightly faster pace is appropriate.  It’s still not a breakneck speed, by any stretch of the imagination, but it complements the broader reach of the story, its greater busyness and a range that this time goes beyond the realm’s borders.

When ‘Last true World’ is available, readers might be surprised by its far pacier narrative.  It moves on from the period of the first two books, and into a time of far faster change, and so my writing style had to reflect that.  I hope those who’ve enjoyed my slower prose style aren’t too shocked, but please don’t blame me, as I confessed earlier, I’m not really the author, but only his scribe.


Check out Clive's books on Amazon.  
Follow Clive on Twitter:  @Clive_SJohnson