Monday, September 3, 2012

Tah-dah! Interview with author Wendy Potocki!!!!!!


Author and all-round busy gal: Wendy Potocki!


1.       Your first novel, The White Lady Murders, came out in 2007.  What is the most significant thing you’ve learned as an author since then?

Oh, my gosh, so much!  One of the most important things I’ve learned is to tell the story no matter what. As a writer, you are an advocate and hold a sacred responsibility to your characters to tell their story. That means you must write down their words and follow the tale where they take it, and not where you want it to go. It adds for excitement, authenticity, and gives a truer feel. It also generally guarantees that the story will not be predictable since people very rarely are.

Then there’s the marketing and selling—the other side of the writing coin. I’ve had to learn all that through networking on the web. It was mind blowing how much I didn’t know, but I learned and am still learning. This leads me to one other very significant thing that I’ve learned which is that an author has to be open to learning if they hope to succeed. While isolation is one of those things that is necessary to write the story, after that, it’s all networking and social media. So be open to the support that’s out there. It’s pure gold.
  
2.       Tell me about your current projects “ZaSo” and “The Virgin”.

ZaSo is a Gothic tale about murders, monsters, and an ancient evil. Set in the late 1800s, it concerns a young protagonist that tries to escape from a monster lurking in the walls of his family’s Bostonian manor. Terrorizing his youth, he holds out hope that his emergence to manhood will set him free.   

The Virgin is a tale of a young theology student. Only wanting to pursue the dream of becoming a youth counselor, her work ethic lands her into hot water. Taking a job at an old mansion, she meets Ernst Rudolph, a persnickety agnostic. Determined to earn enough to pay for her next semester of college, she stays on, brushing the barbed witticisms directed at her calling aside. Hired to watch the old estate while he travels for the holidays, she’s more than certain she can ride out his surly demeanor until departure time. Two fraternity boys help distract and pass the time. Intrigued by her virginity, they begin vying for her affection. Not sure if they’re driven by true love, or the need to claim her innocence as a prize, she tepidly advances, soon learning mysteries about them—and the estate she’s guarding. In trying to untangle the truth, she becomes enmeshed in solving a puzzle where relying on the wrong person can get you killed.

The Virgin is guaranteed to scare off any young person from ever taking a summer job again!
 
3.       In “The Man with the Blue Hat’ you have a character named Sadie, the town drunk.  What was it like creating that character?

Well, I’m one of those writers who believe they have a muse. Therefore, I don’t create characters, they’re more or less born … or introduced to me vis-a-vis my muse. In fact, I don’t start writing until I know my main character’s background, likes, dislikes, and temperament. For instance, I know they love wearing blue, but wouldn’t be caught dead in purple. I also wait until I hear them speaking dialogue, or am given key narrative by my muse. In this way, I’m much more a court reporter taking things down than strategically plotting things out. In the Horns of September, I was given the first chapter of the book, the last chapter of the book, and then a chapter smack dab in the middle! I sat staring at the three disparate sections wondering what the heck went in between.

Sadie was very easy. While a minor character, she is pivotal in revealing key pieces of the plot. Her backstory filled in like a champagne tower at a wedding. Once the bottle was uncorked, it just spilled down filling in all the glasses. Old Sadie has had quite a life, and in the short time we spent together, I came to be quite fond of her. She’s a grand old gal and I enjoyed the time spent with her. I would like to say here that she had her positive and negative qualities, and stress that it’s important that even a minor character be fleshed out to this extent. In other words, as in acting, there are no small characters, only lazy writers!   


4.       What is it that draws you to writing horror?

I suppose the lack of restraints and options available. I can make the stories larger than life and even give actual form to emotions. In other words, if I want jealousy to not only be an emotion, but a monster that lives in the woods, I can do that. It makes for a more apocalyptic feel to the morality tale that I’m attempting to tell.

There’s another reason that’s much more basic. You see, I feel very skittish about writing bad things down that could actually happen. By that I mean, if I wrote about an actual flesh-and-blood serial killer targeting women or children, I would feel just terrible about detailing what this psycho was doing to them. Horror allows me to distance the character from reality. In making the murderer a ghoul, it right away takes the chains off around my arms in writing all the gruesome details because it’s not real … it can’t be real … and will never be real! So it really is a mechanism and device that I use to keep my own sensibilities and morality at bay. If a writer pries their nose too much into the pot that’s boiling, they can exert an influence that is injurious to what is developing. If that happens, they begin to paint everything in the same brush and inject too much of their own personal views into the action. So watch the pot, give it a stir, but let it brew. 
  
5.       Who were some of your literary influences?

Two of my biggest influences were television writers, Rod Serling and Stirling Silliphant. They rocked my world! Loved the Twilight Zone so much growing up. I was amazed at how much tension could be generated by simple dialogue. And Stirling Silliphant’s work was nothing short of brilliant. His stories were complex, his characters painted in such depth, and his dialogue very compelling. If I was watching a story, there was no doubt it was Stirling Sillipant that wrote it.

In terms of a more strict definition, my biggest early influence was The Black Stallion series written by William Farley. I must have read that first book about a thousand times! The meeting of the horse on the ship, the fevered attempts to ride him when on the island, and the bond that was forged—all culminating in that race! Oh, gosh, it’s still exciting for me! Loved that story! So well-written, it captured my imagination and still does.

Growing up I was also heavily influenced by Jack London, Agatha Christie (yes, I love mysteries!), Jane Austen, and Hermann Hesse. Love Hesse’s work so much. Steppenwolf was just so, so, so unexpected. Then there is The Stranger by Albert Camus. Loved it so much, although I had an entirely different interpretation of the ending. There’s also Jean-Paul Sartre, Joyce Carol Oates, Mary Shelley, the Brontes, and the Master of Horror, Mr. Stephen King. Salem’s Lot was the ultimate for me! I bought it and could not put it down. I sat up all night reading through it, and it’s a pretty big book. Kept hearing scrapings at the window, and imagined hands underneath the couch. What a great, inspired piece of writing!

6.       If an aspiring writer asked you for one – just one – piece of advice, what would you say?

I’d tell them to write! Don’t stop, don’t get deterred, just write as much as you can. It’s a craft that gets better with age, and how many things can you say that about? Don’t get discouraged in the beginning that nobody cares or doesn’t want to read what you have to say. It’s very normal and part of the process. The exceptions to that rule are just that—exceptions. Writing is by its nature just a lot of work done alone. It takes concentration, determination, and, yes, ideas! You need time to find your voice and your audience, so just chill a moment. Enjoy the silence. It’s there for a purpose. It gives you time to collect your thoughts and become who you’re meant to be. Write. Hone your craft. You’ll be a better person for it, and a better writer.
                                                                              
7.       Did you plan all along for Adduné to be a series (trilogy)?

Absolutely! The story came to me in three parts! Plus the whole tale is so sweeping that it would have had to be a 4,000 page book. Try lugging that with you on vacation.

While I always have a beginning and ending for every story begun, everything that happens in between is a complete surprise. This mammoth undertaking was no different. I’m almost finished editing The House of Cards, the second in the series. When writing it, I was just about finished when there was this twist that occurred. It had me laughing so hard. Never saw it coming and didn’t plan on it, but it sure is there! It still cracks me up, and, of course, makes perfect sense! I mean, when bad things happen, don’t the most crazy, outrageous things come out of the blue and bop you in the head? It’s like the universe is sticking its tongue out at you, and telling you that you can now consider yourself a human piñata. It was that kind of moment. The kind where you’re dressed up for an interview, and a pigeon takes aim. No avoiding it, it was bound to happen, and it is not good luck.  

The series is wonderful to write, and I hope to read. I’m trying very hard to make each part ratchet up the adventure, suspense, and horror so that it builds. With only Part III. The Reckoning left to write, it’s quite a thrill to be coming to putting the finishing touches on the saga. Of course, the ending is what I’ve been eager to get to all along. I love the ending! I wouldn’t even bother writing the book if I didn’t, so stay tuned for something that I hope will knock your socks off and bring tears to your eyes.

 8.       If a magic Hollywood fairy came along and said that an A-list film producer was going to make a movie of one (just one!) of your books, which would you choose and why?

Oh, it’s so hard to choose! Blast that magic Hollywood fairy for not offering me more wishes! Well, if I had to pick one I’d say Adduné for the reasons mentioned above.  So many wonderful characters, not to mention one that has made herself quite at home. She’s one of these runaway characters that we writers experience now and again. Was supposed to be this minor character, but when she entered stage right, she never left! Tried to shoo her off, but she’s so much fun—just delicious to write. I never know what she’s going to say or do. And, yes, that plot twist that I spoke about earlier had to do with her.

Then there’s Miranda, Peter, Tiffany, Reginald, Bonnie, Wilkins, Beatrice and Willie Figgs, Victor and Elizabeth Rodriguez, Tatiana, Dagmar, Xavier, Carlos, Alejandro, Raoul, Stroker, and the mysterious red egg! Love them all (well, most of them) and would love to see them on the screen, battling it out.

Another reason is that I already have the theme song. It’s Silent Lucidity by Queensryche. I would insist on using it, and would have it written into the contract that it had to be used as the theme for the series. Used it in the trailer for Part I. The Vampire’s Game as it perfectly sets the mood. So I’m ready if that Magic Fairy wants to bestow that wish on me!  

9.       How do you come up with your titles?  Is it just an accident that colours are mentioned in the titles of two of your books?

No, not an accident, and there’s actually three where I’ve done this. I have one entitled Black Adagio. Black Adagio is not yet published as it’s in the process of being edited. Actually, this topic of using colors in writing came up on Facebook. Pat Bertram, a wonderful author, started a discussion in which she asked if writers were using colors in more ways than just for a description. I posted that colors, smells, and other peripheral occurrences were very important to me and my stories. Since I had been writing The House of Cards at the time, I used it as an example. There’s a part in it where a main character changes. She sees a color and is swept away by it. It symbolizes her fall, and the altering of her personality. Love that particular chapter and it’s not unusual for me to do this at all.

I want people to be able to be in the heads of my characters. I want them to feel as if they’re standing beside them, smelling their scent, feeling the texture of their clothing. I want them present at the scenes of their crimes, and to be yelling at potential victims to get out of the house when endangered. Colors, tastes, and odors are important in delivering the atmosphere so I use these invaluable tools to help convey the story, and to give insight into a character. I feel that writing is one of the most comprehensive ways to intimately know someone inside and out. At the end of reading one of my books, that’s how I want the reader to feel. As if they’ve completely understood my characters, even if they don’t agree with some of the things they’ve done.

10.   Authors seem to either love or hate writing dialogue.  What are your thoughts on this?

I love writing dialogue! Why? Because I don’t write it!

As stated above, I have a muse. Therefore, when it comes to dialogue, I sit back and let my characters thrash it out. I turn into a glorified court reporter, taking it all down, and trying not to interfere. In writing my first screenplay, I learned that lesson. There was a particularly wicked character that I just plain hated—still do! What a scoundrel! Possessing absolutely no redeeming qualities, I wanted him dead. In one section of the action, he was behaving very peckishly towards a character that I did love. He persisted, getting on my nerves something fierce. To top it off, in the middle of the scene, he insisted on explaining himself! Horrified, I told him nobody wanted to hear his feeble excuses and to shut up. He answered, insisting that he would have his say. I was absolutely furious at this loathsome creature and retorted, “Not if I kill you off, you won’t!” He replied, “Well, if you do that, you won’t have a script, will you?” Since I couldn’t argue with that logic, I acquiesced, telling him to make it quick before I changed my mind.

Other than that incident, I could sit and let my characters talk for hours. I cry when they’re sad, and laugh when they crack jokes, but I’m always entertained by their antics. They surprise, delight, and sometimes thoroughly disgust and frustrate me, but they never fail to fascinate.

11.   Last question is a bit of a freebie: What is the one question you wish I had asked you but didn’t?  Now go ahead and ask & answer it!

This is a tough one. I guess it would relate to how you keep going when it seems your work is not being accepted the way you believe it should. And I suppose my answer would be based on a message delivered in a PBS special on Julie Taymor. It was in an interview done by Bill Moyers. Ms. Taymor related a story about witnessing a group of Balinese dancers dancing outside. They were in the woods and ostensibly not performing for an audience. She didn’t understand why anyone would do that. She had a background in the theater, and as far as she was concerned one needed an audience to put on a show. In asking why, an epiphany struck her. Sweeping in with the moment of clarity came the understanding, and the reason why these dancers were dancing. It was because they were dancing for God.

I was deeply moved by this sentiment, and humbled. We sometimes do things for money, for power, for control, or for revenge in hopes of getting back at those that belittled us in some way. Sometimes it’s done in the pursuit of happiness we’re sure we’ll find at the end of a rainbow, or to receive compliments about how wonderful someone thinks we can write. The truth is to lose yourself, and submit to a greater power. I suppose it’s why I give credit to my muse and refuse to consider that I alone could create, could perform, could generate such ideas without a powerful force allowing me the privilege of living out my dreams. So always Dance for God. That is reason enough to keep going.

Learn more about Wendy on her AMAZON AUTHOR PAGE.
Follow Wendy on Twitter @WPotocki 






Saturday, August 18, 2012

Hot Stuff! Interview with author Charity Parkerson


Author Charity Parkerson


First question is, whoa! How do you do it all!? You’re a wife and mom, and a prolific author, plus a moderator and reviewer.  So many people say they’d love to write, but just don’t have the time.  So, c’mon, ’fess up: Do you secretly have a 28 hour day that none of us know about!? 

I wish! I'm blessed to be able to write full-time. Plus, I don't sleep, LOL! 

I love the premise of the “Safe Haven” series.  Where did the idea for this originate? 

I had this dream that wouldn't leave me alone. It was so vivid and I had to write it down. From there, it continued to grow until it became this entire world of black ops.

Your book covers are very eye-catching (and a wee bit daring!)  I especially like the cover for “The Informant”.  How important do you think the cover image is? 

I think that it's extremely important. I love that you think they are eye-catching since I designed them. YAY! Go me! :-) I  know that I tend to buy books based on their covers and I will try a new author if it catches my eye.

I bet you had a lot of fun writing the “Sinners” series.  Why did you choose to set “Wicked Sinners” in Martinique? 

Every detail of Wicked Sinners was carefully researched. Julien and Jacques Dubois are thousands of years old and are Druids. I wanted the book to be as genuine as possible. Druids believe in the force of nature and what better place for all of the elements to come together than a  tropical island where there is sun (fire), water, ocean breeze, and sand. Also, Martinique has a heavy French population and France is one of the countries that has stood for thousands of years.    

Character names: Your books have people named Genie Cook, Raven, Ace Sparks, Narmer Horus, and Catriona.  Where and how do you come up with character names? 

A few of my characters are named after people that I know and sometimes I have done my research on certain names so that I can spring a surprise on you in the book.

Naughty stuff now...  What kind of a reaction did you get from friends and family when you began writing high-octane romance and erotica? 

I'm not sure that anyone is ever surprised by anything that I do. I think sometimes I am more embarrassed than anyone around me :-)

You have done a lot in fiction; is there any chance you might someday write non-fiction?  Do you think the same skill set applies to writing fiction and nonfiction? 

I am in the process of writing a non-fiction "how to" guide with fellow author Jeremy Emling. It is a long way from finished and I'm finding it much harder to be myself rather than a fictional character.

Who are two of your favourite authors (living or dead), and name two authors who most inspired you (maybe these are the same...?) 

Only two? Umm, this is such a hard one because there are so many authors that I love. Eloisa James and Lisa Kleypas are two of my many favorites, but I'm inspired by all writers. It takes nerves of steel to pour your soul onto paper and then watch silently as the world judges it loudly.

Just about every author I know has a half-started, then aborted, then re-started, but never finished manuscript stuck away in a box, on the top shelf of a closet...  Do you have something like that, a book you keep promising yourself you’ll finish some day? 

YES! "A Splash of Hope" I've given myself a deadline on it because it is a story that I really love, but my main character is so stubborn. She doesn't want to live the life that I had originally planned for her.

What is the most surprising thing you’ve learned about being an author?  Something you wish you had known, or really didn’t expect, back in the days before you were published? 

I didn't know that there were so many people like me. I thought that I was the only person who couldn't sleep because people were having conversations in my head and wouldn't be quiet. Then I began joining groups on Goodreads and Facebook and realized that I was normal. Who knew?

Last question is a bit of a freebie:   What is the one thing you wish I had asked you but didn’t?  Now go ahead and ask and answer that question. 

Is there anything that I would like to say to readers? Thank you, thank you, thank you. I get to live my dream because of you and there are not enough thank you's in the world for that.
 

Check out Charity's website HERE.  
Get Charity's books on AMAZON click here. 
Follow Charity on Twitter @CharityParkerso




Thursday, August 16, 2012

Interview with Author Scott Whitmore



1. Why did you choose Romania in 1882 – not 1881 or 1782 or or or - as the setting of your novel?
 
The actual year moved around a bit during the writing, but believe it or not there was a method to that decision. First and foremost for the Steampunk aspect I needed a date that was before automobiles were actually invented but after the advent of steam power. Also, I wanted the character of Major Stump O'Brien, the American cavalry officer, to have served in the American Civil War and the Old West. Walking the dog backwards, and assuming Stump enlisted in his late teens, the date 1882 worked out. Finally, Romania broke free of Ottoman control and crowned King Carol (Charles) I in 1881. 
 
Part two of the same question: Why Romania, and not Hungary or Ukraine or Moldova?
 
I needed a setting that shifts from a bustling seaport to remote and nearly inaccessible mountains, and Romania in the 1880s fit the bill perfectly.
 
Also, I have Romanian heritage and enjoyed the idea of setting the story there at a time when the countryside was pristine and somewhat wild. When I was stationed in Naples, Italy with the U.S. Navy, a friend at my command did a personnel exchange with the Romanian Navy and lived in Constanta for two weeks. This was shortly after the Wall came down and the former Soviet satellites were seeking ties to the West. My friend told me the people very friendly, but the economy, infrastructure and especially the environment had been destroyed by the former government. Finally, when I think of vampires that don't sparkle or suffer teenage angst, Dracula and Transylvania come to mind right away.
 
2. Paranormal seems to be wildly popular these days.  Of course, there is the association of Vampires and Romania (Dracula, Transylvania, etc.)  Did you set out to write a vampire story all along, or did that just simply fit the plot?  Might you try your hand at a zombie or werewolf story(or other paranormal) someday?
 
I started out writing a story about an automobile race. As a newspaper reporter and later independent blogger and freelance writer, motorsports was my primary beat, but I wanted to do something set in a historical context. I read a book about the early days of Formula 1 and how long-distance races like Paris-Bordeaux-Paris in 1895, Sicily's Targa Florio (first run in 1906) and Italy's Mille Miglia (first run in 1927) set the stage for today's Grand Prix, and that seemed very interesting.
 
The vampire and Steampunk aspects came later as I was thinking through the plot and trying to decide on types of conflict I could add to the story. I am a big fan of Cherie Priest's Clockwork Century books (Boneshaker, Dreadnought, Ganymede) and O.M. Grey's novel Avalon Revisited, all of which feature paranormal aspects in a Steampunk setting, zombies and vampires, respectively.
 
Although vampires were never my favorite movie monster growing up, the characteristics fit the setting and plot best of all. I'm not a fan of the current crop of "sparkly" bloodsuckers, so I made the conscious decision to have my vampires be more like the ones I watched in old black-and-white "creature feature" movies of my youth. In fact, throughout I wanted the story have a retro "Indiana Jones" adventure feel, with action, good and evil well defined, a suitably Victorian love affair (i.e., no sex), and stylized (i.e., not graphic) violence.
 
I don't feel tied to the paranormal or Steampunk genres, but do enjoy the freedom they allow me to indulge my imagination. I've written notes to myself with plot elements for a sci-fi/dystopian story to write at some point, and started but quit working on a military-political thriller (the plot unraveled). I also have had an idea for a story that might be considered a romance. There is also the (obligatory?) third book in the Carpathia series to consider.
 
3. Tell me about your current work in progress.
 
The book I'm working on now is tentatively titled Dead Man's Land. It is set in the same "universe" as Carpathia, but thirty years later during World War I. A few of the characters return, but I'm hoping the plot will stand alone.
 
It is very funny that you mentioned trying my hand at a "zombie or werewolf story" because this story involves zombies, and I have had some early thoughts on a third book in the Carpathia universe involving werewolves taking over a crime syndicate in 1950s Chicago.
 
Because Dead Man's Land is set in my version of history, I've decided the generals on both sides decided early in the war to stop sending masses of men on bloody and futile charges against machine guns and artillery. Instead, the action along the Western Front is limited to airship battles and raids.
 
To break the resultant stalemate on the front lines, the scientists and engineers of both the Allies and Germany try to come up with weapons that will give their side an advantage. One of those is a chemical/biologic agent that brings the dead back to life, and through a series of events this agent is unleashed on the front lines, creating all sorts of havoc.
 
There are multiple plot lines (soooo hard to keep straight) and I hope a satisfying mix of action, adventure, and thrills including those airship battles. Must have airships, because that seems to be what most people who read Carpathia liked the best :) I just passed 90,000 words on the first draft and expect it to be around 110,000 when finished.
 
4. What is the most satisfying thing about being a published novelist?
 
Establishing a legacy as, for lack of a better description, an artist. My name is now forever associated with a novel, a story I created in my head and labored to produce for others to read and hopefully enjoy. I don't act, paint, woodwork, sculpt, sing or play an instrument. I write.
 
In college I wrote research papers and in the Navy my writing was very technical: correspondence, messages, reports, directives, etc. At the newspaper I wrote profiles of people and covered high school sporting events and auto races; there was no room for embellishment.
 
There are important and respected forms of each of this type of writing, but in a way they are merely tools, like a hammer or screwdriver, to relay information. Writing fiction or poetry, producing a narrative from the imagination, is art.
 
I also have a legacy as a son, brother, husband, father and grandfather, and for what I did in the Navy. These are all satisfying to me as well, but in different ways. 
 
5. What is the strangest thing a fan or reviewer has ever said to you (whether in person or online)?
 
The least expected would be from my mother, who told me she loved it! As a dutiful son I gave her a copy fully expecting it would go unread, or that she would stop after the prologue as vampires really are not her thing. But, she called me after finishing it, and I know she read it all because she had some very detailed questions. In fact, her comment of "you've got to write a sequel" is what got me thinking about Dead Man's Land, because I was not planning on doing another story in the Carpathia universe.
 
Other than that, I think some of the comments indicate fans believe airships like the ones I described actually existed in the 1880s. I used my service on U.S. Navy ships to inform the scenes set on the airships, and evidently that has lent an air of accuracy that is welcome but so very wrong. For Dead Man's Land, I intend on including a small "Notes on Historical Accuracy" section. :)
 
6. If you had to name one personality trait that is common among (and necessary for) authors, what trait would you say that is?
 
For the writer of fiction, an imagination that is vivid enough to create an entire "universe" and then tie all the pieces of that universe together into a story. Even stories like your wonderful Sasha Jackson books that are set in real locations, without paranormal or supernatural elements, exist in a universe of the author's creating. Some stories include a lot of the universe in the plot, while others are more spare and lean on background but there is still a unique world there that was hatched in the writer's mind.
 
7. You have been blogging for a while, and your blog posts often include book reviews.  Have you ever been asked to review a book you just didn’t like? Now that you have a book out there of your own, is it harder or easier to write a review of someone else’s novel?
 
My personal policy on reviews is that I will not write one unless I can be positive about the book. I have only been asked by an author once to review a book, and as it turns out I liked it very much. But going in I explained to this writer that a review would be contingent upon my enjoyment of the story. If I didn't like it, only the writer and I would know.
 
Just the other day I started a novel that has been on my Kindle for quite some time. I got three chapters in and stopped. The story just didn't resonate with me, and honestly I wondered what possessed me to buy it in the first place. This has not happened a lot, perhaps four times in the past year, but rather than slog through the book and then write a negative review, I just stop.
 
To a casual observer of my reviews I probably look like a shill because all are positive and four or five stars, but I just do not see the point in slamming another writer or damning them with faint, scrabbled-together praise. I am not arrogant enough to believe my taste is universal; what I hate you may love, and why should I prevent you from finding that out for yourself?
 
With that as a policy, writing reviews is actually pretty easy. I liked the book, so its just a matter of articulating in a review what it was that I liked about it. I do not include spoilers in my reviews, so the toughest part is not giving out too much of the story. 
 
One of the beautiful aspects of the Indie Author movement is that most novels these days cost less than a gallon of gasoline. So, the total cost of the four or five books I've stopped reading in the past year is less than one copy of the latest New York-published Grisham best-seller. That makes it a little easier to pass on something that isn't working for me.
 
Now, if I was paid to review books by a media outlet, my view would be different. In that case it would be my job (and a great one at that, being paid to read!) to provide an opinion on whatever was submitted for review.
 
8. If Hollywood were going to make a movie version of Carpathia, who would you wish to cast in the roles of Olivia Lowenby (I love that name!) and prince Radu Zeklos?
 
My perfect choice for the beautiful and smart Olivia would be Kate Beckinsale. First because I have a huge crush on her, but also because I have a huge crush on her. :) I picked the name Olivia as a shout-out to O. M. Grey, the pen name of Christine Rose. I greatly enjoyed Grey's book Avalon Revisited and after connecting with her on Twitter she was very supportive and encouraging of me trying to write my own novel. 
 
I had not given much thought to casting Zeklos before, but I think Dominic West, who was so good as Detective Jimmy McNulty in The Wire, would be a good choice. Dark and a bit older and careworn, but still powerful. Joseph Fiennes would be another option, or Sean Bean although he is getting a bit long in the tooth.
 
You didn't ask, but the physical description of Stump O'Brien is based on actor Donal Logue, who was recently in the terrific and much-too-short TV show Terriers. I've also been fortunate enough to connect with him on Twitter, and sent him a copy of Carpathia. Although he has written screenplays before, he is working on his first novel and told me he has great admiration for all of us who have sweated through the process.
 
9. When you were writing Carpathia, which character gave you the most trouble?
 
As a man, Olivia was the toughest to write. I wanted her to be smart and capable, but also feminine — truth be told those are three characteristics I have little familiarity with! :) Having the story set in the Victorian era was also a challenge; the reader will notice her hairstyle and what she is wearing are rarely mentioned. I think at one point I put her in coveralls just so I wouldn't have to worry about her skirts getting caught on things. :)
 
In my original draft Olivia was in love with Daniel Jameson, whose wife was killed by Zeklos. Stump becomes enamored of Olivia, and it was my idea to have a triangle. But as the plot unspooled it just didn't work for Olivia to be pining away for Jameson, so I eliminated that part. The dinner party banter between Stump and Olivia was one of my favorite scenes to write.
 
10. Last question is a bit of a freebie: What is the one question you wish I had asked you but didn’t?  Now go ahead and ask & answer it!
 
Hmmmm, so many choices: Chicken or beef? Cash or credit? Cubs or White Sox? Plastic or paper? Aisle or window?
 
During a job interview I was once asked what is something positive my worst enemy would say about me, and something negative my best friend would say. I thought that was a pretty original question, and was later told that my response to it had a lot to do with getting hired (it was  a government job and although offered a long-term contract I left at the end of a mandatory six-month probationary period because the job was MIND-NUMBINGLY BORING!).
 
My response was that I didn't have any enemies (this was, after all, a job interview) but if I did they would say I was honest. As for the other part of the question, a good friend who I taught class with at a Navy training command told me I was arrogant. My response when he said that was to agree with his assessment, but in my defense I was usually right.
 
Getting older has helped me to see how wrong I was, and I've thought about that conversation many times since. Since those days of youthful ignorance, I have tried hard to remember there is a whole lot more that I don't know than I do know. 

Follow Scott on Twitter @ScottWhitmore 
Check out his Blog here.
You can get your own copy of Carpathia right here on AMAZON
Visit Scott's Author Page.

Scott Whitmore... always with a pen in hand!!!

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Here and there online...

Sasha Jackson and I have been wandering the Cyber World, and here's a few places we've shown up:

JUNGLE RED WRITERS blog.  I did a guest post for these deadly and delightful scribes.  The article is called "The Case of the Missing Character".  Have a look at what's missing from the mystery genre...
CLICK HERE.

MYSTERIES AND MORE Blogger Bill Selnes is alphabetically working his way through a list of mystery authors.  "E is for Edmondson" and I'm so glad it is!  Check out what Bill has to say...
CLICK HERE.

BOOKGASM, yes, Book-gasm, is a wonderful site featuring book reviews of "reading material to get excited about."  They sure got excited about THE LIES HAVE IT, book three in the Sasha Jackson Mysteries series.  See what they think...
CLICK HERE.

Last but not least, CONFESSIONS OF A MYSTERY NOVELIST has an article on the "world's oldest profession" and mystery novels.  Not surprisingly, blogger and author Margot Kinberg gives Dead Light District  a mention...
CLICK HERE.

Also:  DEAD LIGHT DISTRICT is free today and tomorrow on Amazon Kindle.  CLICK HERE.   



Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Thoughts on the new "Spenser" mystery by Ace Atkins.


Let me begin by saying that, YES, I enjoyed it.  

Action, suspense, I liked the client/kid (Mattie), I was happy to see Hawk return (he was pretty much absent in the last two Spenser installments by Robert B. Parker), there were some clever quips and all the other good stuff that makes a Spenser novel a good read.

But but but... This is a Spenser book by Ace Atkins (congrats on the new job, man!), not by Parker himself.  You just know that fans and critics will be ready to pounce if Atkins doesn't measure up.  

Not to worry: He does.  A reader almost... almost couldn't tell the difference between an Atkins Spenser novel and a Parker Spenser novel.

Except...

There were four things I noticed in the Atkins book that were just a tad different from a Parker book.

1 - Hawk:  Hawk talks much more than in previous novels, and in full sentences. I'm not sure if I liked this or not.  I had a thing for the strong silent type...

2 - Swearing:  It seems to me that earlier Spenser books had a few four letter words, but Lullaby seemed to have quite a few, and they usually began with F or with motherf...  I am not a prude - it was just something I noticed.

3 - Music references:  I liked this!  References to musicians or to song titles were minimal in the Parker Spenser novels.  Atkins changes this and it's a good thing (in my opinion).  Bluesy-Jazz, yeah baby!

4 - Spenser's Roots:  One of the alluring things about Spenser is his mysterious past.  Readers of the series know that he's from Laramie, Wyoming, and know that his uncles played a major role in his early life.  Readers are told almost zilch about Spenser's mom and dad.  Atkins doesn't necessarily provide new details or fill in the blanks of Spenser's past, but the mentions of his roots are more frequent than with Parker.  In more than one Parker novel, there is no mention at all of Spenser's childhood, so to have 4 or 5 in Lullaby seems like a lot.

I would like to see Atkins do another Spenser novel.  And I'd like him to write in a scene where the willowy, ethereal Dr. Susan Silverman gets accidentally run over by a bus.  That's a change I'd like to see!

Sunday, June 3, 2012

No One Ever Asks Me If I Play The Drums...

Readers and writers are familiar with the phrase "write what you know".  It's good advice as it is certainly much easier to portray a setting or to describe a topic with which you are familiar.

But let's not forget:  Fiction is FICTION!!!  

This Spring has been a busy time for me.  I've done a number of interviews, several book signings and then of course I was at the Bloody Words Mystery Convention this weekend (more on BW in another post).

Several times  - and I mean SEVERAL - times in the last while, people have either obliquely or directly asked me about myself and the sex stuff/fetish stuff in the Sasha books.  At times, the question is subtle ("How did you do the research for..." or "How do you know so much about...?") but I have frequently been asked point blank: "Are you into [whatever] or are you Vanilla?"

I could never see myself asking anyone, whether a close friend or a casual work acquaintance, about their sex life.  That's just not cool.  It's actually really kind of creepy to think that people might be picturing MOI with whatever or doing whatever.  Ick. Please imagine something/someone else.

I do like talking about the books and I love Sasha, and yes, I am a lot like her.  And I think Sasha's pretty fleshed out: We know her background, her attitudes, her hobbies, her sense of humour and her (dubious) talents.  Yet no one has ever asked me if I do in fact:

-play the drums
-sing
-have a talent for burglary
-know how to drive (actually, Bill Selnes at Mysteries and More blog did ask me that, but he is the only one...)

There are so many places and things mentioned that people don't ask about that I DO know first hand but many folks don't realize this:

- all the Mexico stuff in Dead Light District is true - I used to live there
- all the gambling references are true and accurate: my real Dad (and Sasha's Dad) is a professional gambler (and Dad is mentioned in the Blackjack Encyclopedia for one of his card counting theories)
- Dooley's house in High Park and Jessica's apartment downtown are both places where I once lived
- Sasha's old office on Yonge Street is where I once rented space
- her tastes in music, food and drink are all the same as mine

But no.  No one ever asks about this stuff.  Everyone wants to know instead about phone sex, or hookers or leather or or or...   It's really annoying.  I doubt anyone ever asked Parker if he's actually killed anyone, or Block if he's really in love with a former prostitute, or Larson if he really slept around that much.